An innovative new compensation scheme at Coke
Friday, April 7th, 2006
Earlier in the week, Coca-Cola unveiled a radical new plan to link director compensation to company performance. Instead of receiving an annual fee of $125,000 ($50,000 cash and $75,000 in stock), company directors will now be given share grants each year equal in value to $175,000. The grants will be payable in cash in three years provided the company increases earnings per share by 8% each year. According to Bloomberg News, the decision to overhaul its compensation structure for directors was strongly promoted by board member Warren Buffett: “It’s a good idea. I’m delighted it’s happening now. It aligns director interests with shareholder interests both on the upside and the downside.”
Maybe I’m missing something here, but this looks like a sweetheart deal for Buffett, already one of the world’s wealthiest individuals. For one thing, his company - Berkshire Hathaway - is Coca-Cola’s largest shareholder, so he’s obviously interested in boosting Coke’s share price for his own personal gain. What’s good for Coke is good for Berkshire Hathaway, so it’s not surprising that he wants to lock in 8% earnings growth each year. Secondly, he’s stepping down from the Coke board on April 19 after 17 years, so the pesky little matter of whether he receives $125,000 in cash each year is moot anyway.
Anyway, according to a recent survey by Corporate Library, only 2% of the 2,000 largest public companies tie a portion of director pay to performance, so Coke is really getting out in front of this one. Corporate governance experts have thus far been upbeat about the idea: “The fact that directors might go without pay is meaningful. It shows, on the part of the directors, confidence that the company has a good future.”
In my own opinion, aligning the incentives of managers and employees with those of shareholders is a great idea. But attempting to align the incentives of board directors with those of shareholders? It doesn’t seem to be as effective, since directors aren’t actually involved in the day-to-day functioning of the company. They’re not down in the trenches. Moreover, they’re already highly-compensated from another source, so any pay they receive as board directors is really just icing on the cake. Instead of dining at swanky, five-star restaurants each night with their trophy wives (or trophy husbands), they’ll be dining at swanky, four-star restaurants each night. I mean, check out some of the folks on Coke’s board: Barry Diller, former AmEx CEO James Robinson III, former Delta Air Lines CEO Ron Allen, former SunTrust Banks Chairman James B. Williams and former U.S. Senator Sam Nunn.
Tags: Coke WarrenBuffett board compensation
In coordination with its 
In this week’s
After the big brouhaha over the Dubai ports deal in the U.S. and the still simmering rage over those Danish cartoons, let’s show the Arab world some love. Can’t we all just get along?
On Sunday’s edition of “60 Minutes,” reporter Lesley Stahl examined the
I missed the first five minutes or so of the